Skip to content

Introducing PaladinOur first field-based AI model

Closed general intelligence.

A frontier AI lab developing field-based intelligence.

Paladin, against the frontier

6 models · 5 benchmarks

Benchmark

#5Paladin trails by 4.7

Graduate-level science questions.

Paladin, against the frontier. Demo numbers, not real results.
BenchmarkPaladinClaudeGPTGeminiGrokDeepSeek
GPQA Diamond78.480.283.181.079.374.2
SWE-bench Verified74.677.072.466.163.064.3
AIME 202691.383.790.086.788.182.0
τ²-bench79.875.170.464.960.258.3
RULER 1M93.184.080.290.474.570.1

420.69x Faster,690.69x Cheaper.

*Placeholder figures, not measured results.

Paladin, against a chat model.

Time per task
Paladin
0.11 s
Chat model
46.28 s

Each square is one Paladin task. The grid is one chat-model task.

Cost per task
Paladin
$0.00002
Chat model
$0.01381

Each square is one Paladin task. The grid is one chat-model task.

Holds more. Makes up less.

*Placeholder figures, not measured results.

Context window

Context windowHow much each model takes in at once, in tokens, on one scale. Paladin holds 10 million.

Hallucinations

HallucinationsHow often each model states something its inputs don’t support, on the same workflows. Paladin: none.
Context window. *Placeholder figures, not measured results.
ModelMakerContext window (tokens)
PaladinMumbrane10,000,000
GeminiGoogle2,000,000
GrokxAI2,000,000
ClaudeAnthropic1,000,000
GPTOpenAI1,000,000
DeepSeekDeepSeek128,000
Hallucinations. *Placeholder figures, not measured results.
ModelMakerHallucination rate
PaladinMumbrane0.00%
GPTOpenAI0.62%
ClaudeAnthropic1.94%
GeminiGoogle2.37%
DeepSeekDeepSeek3.81%
GrokxAI4.60%